Abstract

ABSTRACT In Nashville, Tennessee, arts and culture have become levers for competition, civic engagement, and collective action. Specifically, the proliferation of an artistic civic practice—creative placemaking and other efforts to promote social inclusion, address public problems, and enliven public participation through the arts—is cast as a “civic pivot” within the cultural sector. I argue that Nashville’s “civic pivot” in the arts is a vehicle through which to examine how public life is made marketable, and the specifically racial considerations of this commodification. This research is based on 18 months of mixed methods qualitative fieldwork in a city where contestations over land-use, representation, identity, and belonging have been long-standing. I argue that artistic civic practices are enrolled in maintaining a social and racial order that is hospitable to market investment, absorbing pressures to brand a genteel urban politics and underscore effective social assimilation. Such practices make public life marketable to the extent that they facilitate common interests in private sector investment and assimilate specifically racial histories and claims into endorsements of the “greater good” of regional prosperity. The contradictions of this civic pivot are vulnerabilities to be exploited by citizen-subjects, continuing to enliven struggles for belonging.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.