Abstract
While there is a burgeoning literature critically mapping the spatial logics of immigration detention around the world, there is relatively little systematic research on geographies of resistance, particularly the role of ‘outsiders’ – members of the public with relatively secure status. This article considers how people mobilise around immigration detention in the UK to challenge the status quo. Drawing on qualitative interviews and survey research, it offers in a fine-grained analysis of what nourishes civic mobilization, considering the concerns and positionalities of volunteers. It examines their experiences of taking action, visiting detention centres or campaigning for change, highlighting rewards and challenges. Probing divergences as well as convergences in people’s approaches to the issue, a picture is built up of a vibrant detention movement working across multiple spaces and scales against government efforts to isolate, contain and exclude ‘unwanted’ migrants. How this civic mobilization challenges moral distance and political closure offers a fresh insight to the geography of detention and study of pro-migrant mobilisation.
Highlights
Governments across Europe and North America have engaged in increasingly restrictive immigration policy in recent years
A picture is built up of a vibrant detention movement working across multiple spaces and scales against government efforts to isolate, contain and exclude ‘unwanted’ migrants
Sometimes emotional management and self-care entailed a certain level of normalization (Mann, 2015), for instance resigning oneself to frustrating security practices, or thinking of trying to get people out of detention as ‘a game [which I worry at times] makes me objectify the individuals concerned in a way creepily similar to UKBA.’
Summary
Governments across Europe and North America have engaged in increasingly restrictive immigration policy in recent years. A series of measures aiming at containing and disciplining mobility previously used primarily in times of war and crisis – detention, deportation and dispersal – have become increasingly normalized as ‘commonsense’ aspects of immigration control (Bloch and Schuster, 2005; Gill, 2016). The concluding remarks explore how this mobilization challenges moral distance and political closure
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
