Abstract

AbstractCivic‐led banishment, a fundamentally spatial punishment, is an understudied phenomenon in South Africa and beyond. We define it as “a punitive spatial practice, enacted by non‐state actors in response to alleged criminality or deviance, which attempts varying degrees of socio‐spatial expulsion over time”. This definition lays the framework for a socio‐spatial analysis of punishment, and yields insights into the exercise of socio‐spatial control in public and private space. We emphasise the specific challenges associated with banishment, together with the relationship between space, punishment, public authority, and sovereignty. We demonstrate how “negotiations” around banishment trade off two forms of intersecting precarity: those faced by residents in informal settlements and the potential precarity of public authorities. Finally, we argue that an exploration of all forms of punishment through the lens of socio‐spatial expulsion enables us to tap into conversations around penal abolitionism.

Highlights

  • Interest in banishment has been growing in recent years, with scholars expanding both the times and places in which they study this phenomenon (e.g. Washburn 2013), and extending its definition (e.g. Beckett and Herbert 2010a, 2010b; Roy 2018, 2019; Super 2020)

  • This paper explores how the socio-political and spatial specificities of informal settlements in South Africa shape the possibilities of banishment, raising particular challenges for those seeking a space of impunity for their actions

  • This paper explores how the social, political and spatial specificities of informal settlements in South Africa shape the possibilities of banishment that exist there

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest in banishment has been growing in recent years, with scholars expanding both the times and places in which they study this phenomenon (e.g. Washburn 2013), and extending its definition (e.g. Beckett and Herbert 2010a, 2010b; Roy 2018, 2019; Super 2020). Beckett and Herbert 2010a, 2010b; Roy 2018, 2019; Super 2020). We situate our paper amidst these generative discussions, focusing on “civic-led” banishment. We use this term to refer to actions instigated by social actors rather than state institutions and officials. Building on Super (2016, 2020) we argue that civic-led banishment is an important, but underexplored, mode of penal control in South Africa. Antipode published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Antipode Foundation Ltd. Antipode published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Antipode Foundation Ltd

Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call