Abstract
AbstractData analytics is a key resource to analyze cities and to find their strengths and weaknesses to define long-term sustainable strategies. On the one hand, urban planning is geared to adapting cities’ strategies towards a qualitative, intelligent, and sustainable growth. On the other hand, institutions are geared towards open governance and collaborative administration models. In this context, sustainability has become a global concern for urban development, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs), defined by United Nations, are the framework to be followed to define the new city goals and to measure the advances of the policies implemented over recent years. The main objective of this research is to explain the methods and results of the application of a city assessment tool for measuring the impact of public policies on the socioeconomic and environmental structure of a city. It addresses the case study of the evaluation of the strategic plan “Diseña 2020” of the municipality of Alcobendas (Madrid, Spain, with 116.037 inhabitants), the document used to communicate the actions needed to achieve the city goals during the planning exercise. A selection of urban indicators has been aligned with the SDGs defined in the Agenda 2030 to develop a tool for the measurement of the impacts of policies in economic, social, and ecological terms. Through this set of indicators, the tool is able to quantify the impact of the policies on the city and the SDGs and to support the decision-making processes of the administration. The set of urban indicators is divided into five areas: economic development and employment, sustainable development, open government, social responsibility, and quality of life. The data evolution, across the recent years 2012–2018, is used to monitor and benchmark the effects of the applied policies. In addition, Alcobendas can be compared with other Spanish and European cities with similar characteristics; it makes possible assessing the achievement of the city’s strategic areas, incorporating the current trends and fostering the SDGs. Thanks to the quantitative comparable results and the objective approach, this research shows a methodology based on indicators that could be applied and scaled to other cities to generate a common framework for measuring the impact of public policies on cities.
Highlights
Sustainability has become a global concern (Keivani 2010) for urban development, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) defined by United Nations represent the framework to be followed as a combination of three global problems: ecological, economic, and social issues
The SDGs define new guidelines to be included in a holistic framework and offer quantitative goals to reach a global model of sustainable development (Sachs 2012)
The 64 selected urban indicators reflect a positive evolution in all the strategic goals
Summary
Sustainability has become a global concern (Keivani 2010) for urban development, and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) defined by United Nations represent the framework to be followed as a combination of three global problems: ecological, economic, and social issues. The SDGs define new guidelines to be included in a holistic framework and offer quantitative goals to reach a global model of sustainable development (Sachs 2012) In this regard, cities have a fundamental role in the advancement of SDGs (OECD 2016), and European local administrations are beginning to establish local goals to design new strategies and policies that follow SDGs. Monitoring the SDGs is an important challenge and a strategic opportunity for stakeholders and beneficiaries involved in the Agenda 2030 at all levels (Sachs 2012), and this requires a method to measure SDGs for defining and eventually achieving them (Lu et al 2015; Schmidt et al 2015). Public administration generates and collects a vast quantity of data in many domains (Janssen et al 2012), and data supports policy-makers in addressing complex problems (Arzberger et al 2004); indicators are being increasingly recognized as a useful tool in policy analysis and public communication (Melchiorri and Siragusa 2018)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have