Abstract

All systems of social welfare depend on classification, and John W. Mohr is right to say concerning welfare states that: "What is interesting is how alternative principles of classification are created, how they operate, and how they are transformed." 1 Precisely such a change occurred between 1908 and 1911 in Britain, as Liberal social reformers, academics, government officials, and Labour Party officials came together to create a new classificatory language and a new legal regime for a large section of the unemployed in the United Kingdom. Crucial to this change was the emergence of a demand for a "right to work." This article explores how the demand for a "right to work" emerged, and the manner in which it played a key role in reshaping British welfare classification. The appearance of new claims for rights is seen as a major indicator of changing political relationships.2 The willingness of governments and powerholders to negotiate over rights indicates a degree of acceptance for a claim-making group. But concessions always have a two-fold character. Recognition increases a group's institutional character and thus its resources, but it also forces a group to define its priorities more clearly and to clarify its identity. Any evaluation of the outcome of social conflict must take into account both aspects of successful claim making.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call