Abstract

Countries are offering citizenship and residency for investment schemes in an attempt to raise revenues or attract rich individuals. While there may be legitimate reasons for acquiring such residency or citizenship certificates (e.g. visa-free traveling, studying or working in a different country), these schemes can also be exploited by individuals trying to escape legitimate prosecutions for crimes, to engage in money laundering or to violate international sanctions. Also importantly, to avoid reporting under automatic exchange of information for tax purposes. The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for automatic exchange of information requires financial institutions to determine the account holder’s residency in order to share their information with the relevant jurisdiction’s authority. If the account holder acquires citizenship or residency certificates, not to genuinely move to a different country but only to trick their bank and have them believe that they reside there, their relevant banking information will not be sent to the correct jurisdiction, or may not even be collected at all. This paper describes the different factors that reduce or increase risks of citizenship and residency certificates from being used to avoid the CRS, and proposals on how to address this issue. Annex I contains an updated list of all the jurisdictions offering these schemes, classified by their level of risk.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call