Abstract

The collection of scientific data by people without a science degree is at least as old as Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, but thanks to smartphones it now involves large numbers of volunteers, leading to studies about who the so called “citizen scientists” are, how they behave, and how to improve their work. There are, however, no worldwide studies about citizen science projects reporting fauna killed in road collisions. Here we analyze data from the 31 projects available in September 2017 in iNaturalist.org, the largest website for this subject. The USA and Europe have the most projects, but after correcting for population size, countries like Costa Rica and Canada are outstanding, possibly thanks to widespread Internet access and high educational levels. Projects had a mean of 431 observations, 48 species, of 32 volunteers who, on average, posted 19 observations each. Most volunteers contributed few records and were active only briefly. The roadkill data shows that, in the tropics, seasonal mortality trends match the movement of animals in search of water for drinking and for reproduction, while in temperate sites project differences depended mostly on which particular species is studied. We recommend future consideration of how the behavior of volunteers and projects changes along time, a subject that has seldom been considered in previous studies

Highlights

  • RESUMEN: Ciencia ciudadana y muerte en carreteras: tendencias a lo largo de la vida de los proyectos y comparación de proyectos tropicales y templados

  • Most citizen science projects are located in the USA, followed by Mexico, Canada and Costa Rica (Digital Appendix 1)

  • This study considers most of the citizen science roadkill projects currently available to the public worldwide, because, with the exception of wildlifecrossing.net, most projects identified by searches in scistarter.com, scientificamerican.com and blog.nature.org are no longer online or available in any way

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RESUMEN: Ciencia ciudadana y muerte en carreteras: tendencias a lo largo de la vida de los proyectos y comparación de proyectos tropicales y templados. La recolección de datos científicos por personas sin un título científico es al menos tan antigua como Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, pero ahora gracias a los teléfonos inteligentes involucra a un gran número de voluntarios, lo que lleva a estudios sobre quiénes son los llamados “científicos ciudadanos”, cómo se comportan y cómo mejorar su trabajo. Citizen science projects are considered useful when large scale data are needed, and in the case of biology, common applications include phenology, climate change, pollution, species distribution, population fluctuations and ecosystem productivity (Dickinson et al, 2012; Chandler et al, 2017). (Fleur, 2017), citizen science is a means of obtaining reliable large data sets at very low costs, because “citizen scientists” normally work for free and use cheap technology like smartphones (Chandler et al, 2017). Despite laudatory opinions matching citizen observers with professional scientists (e.g. McKinley et al, 2017), citizen science data can be insufficient, biased or plainly wrong (Dickinson, et al, 2010; Gardiner, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call