Abstract

This paper follows the process of developing a pilot project at Lø in Steinkjer, where a zero emission neighbourhood was planned and which included the upgrading of the old offices of the Norwegian Broadcasting Company (NRK) to a zero emission kindergarten. The decision-making process up to March 2018 is described. When the decision to demolish the NRK building and build a new kindergarten at Lø was made, stopping plans for a ZEN pilot project. The decision was based on the wishes of representatives from two kindergartens who were to be co-located in the planned zero emission kindergarten. The paper asks why two different understandings of the needs of the project were established and proposes solutions for avoiding disaffection with projects with high energy and environmental ambitions during the early stages of the development process.Method. An ethnographic process was carried out by the Research Centre for Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities (ZEN Centre) in collaboration with Steinkjer Municipality in Norway in 2017 and 2018. The process included participant observation, individual semi-structured interviews and group interviews.Results. During the planning process, the representatives from the kindergartens experienced that they were not heard, and that the needs of the building users were peripheral to the discussions taking place. When the chairmanship of Steinkjer Municipality took the decision to demolish the old NRK building and build a new kindergarten at Lø, the kindergarten representatives finally felt that user needs were in focus. The process is presented and discussed in the form of two main stories. (1) The citizen’s story about the kindergarten at Lø, where the kindergarten representatives’ reasons for their request for a new, rather than upgraded kindergarten building, are told. (2) The story about the ZEN pilot project in Steinkjer, that is external, and concept based. In this story, the reasons for the enthusiasm for the pilot project by Steinkjer municipality and ZEN researchers are explained.

Highlights

  • According to the Research Centre for Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities (ZEN Centre), in the future, zero emission neighbourhoods in Norwegian towns and cities will enable a significant improvement in energy efficiency, increase the supply of affordable renewable energy and help to reduce CO2 emissions

  • This paper follows the process of developing a pilot project at Lø in Steinkjer, where a zero emission neighbourhood was planned and which included the upgrading of the old offices of the Norwegian Broadcasting Company (NRK) to a zero emission kindergarten

  • When the chairmanship of Steinkjer Municipality took the decision to demolish the old NRK building and build a new kindergarten at Lø, the kindergarten representatives felt that user needs were in focus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the Research Centre for Zero Emission Neighbourhoods in Smart Cities (ZEN Centre), in the future, zero emission neighbourhoods in Norwegian towns and cities will enable a significant improvement in energy efficiency, increase the supply of affordable renewable energy and help to reduce CO2 emissions. Too often pilots are presented as hero stories in which actors overcome difficulties and succeed, having achieved a heroic deed against all obstacles. We avoid such a one-sided account by exploring the multiple stories that can be told about a pilot. In the Autumn 2017, researchers from the ZEN Centre began following the planning process around the rehabilitation of the old Norwegian Broadcasting Company (NRK) offices at Lø, in Steinkjer. The process is described up to March 2018 when Steinkjer Municipality’s executive committee made the decision to demolish the NRK building and build a new kindergarten at Lø, stopping plans for a ZEN pilot project. The paper asks why different understandings of the needs of the project were established and proposes solutions for avoiding disaffection with projects with high energy and environmental ambitions during the early stages of the development process

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.