Abstract
Extant scholarship on citation has examined a limited number of citational features, adopted disciplinary and ethnolinguistic perspectives disjunctively, and paid little systematic attention to the nature of cited sources. Drawing on appraisal theory, the present study investigated the nature of cited sources, namely personalization (i.e., whether humans are foregrounded as a cited source) and identification (i.e., whether and how the cited sources are identified), to understand their dialogic functionality in knowledge making. We analyzed citations in a corpus of 84 research articles sampled from two disciplines and two languages. Greater citation-based dialogic contraction was found in the medical articles than in the applied linguistic articles, whereas the cross-linguistic contrasts revealed a mixed picture. The differences are explained in terms of divergent epistemologies, cultural beliefs, discursive practices, institutional settings, and co-patterning of different citation features.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
