Abstract

Reactions of [MoO2(acetylacetonate)2], 2‐((2‐(2‐hydroxyethylamino)ethylamino)methyl)‐4‐R‐phenols (H2Ln, n = 1–5 for R = H, Me, OMe, Cl and Br, respectively) and KOH in 1:1:2 mole ratio in methanol afford a series of complexes having the general formula cis‐[MoO2(Ln)] (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) in 81–86% yields. The complexes have been characterized using elemental analysis, spectroscopy (infrared, UV–visible, and 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 13C‐DEPT NMR) and electrochemical measurements. The molecular structures of 1, 2, 3, 4 have been determined using single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. In each of 1, 2, 3, 4, the ONNO‐donor 6,5,5‐membered fused chelate rings forming (Ln)2− and the two mutually cis oxo groups assemble a distorted octahedral N2O4 coordination sphere around the metal centre. In the crystal lattice, each of 1, 2, 3, 4 forms a one‐dimensional infinite chain structure via intermolecular NH⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bonding interactions. In cyclic voltammograms, the diamagnetic complexes display an irreversible metal‐centred reduction in the potential range −0.73 to −0.88 V (vs Ag/AgCl). The physicochemical data are consistent with a very similar gross molecular structure for all of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. All the complexes exhibit decent bromoperoxidase activities and are also able to effectively catalyse benzoin and methyl(phenyl)sulfide oxidation reactions. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.