Cirugía de rescate en las recidivas locales del carcinoma de nasofaringe

Abstract

Introduction and objectivesChemoradiotherapy is the treatment of choice for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Local recurrences are one of the leading causes of death in these patients, and surgical salvage the treatment of choice. Our goal was to evaluate and compare the results of salvage surgery in the treatment of local recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinomas comparing endoscopic to open approaches. MethodsTwenty patients with local recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinomas underwent surgery: 12 patients underwent open surgery and 8 endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid nasopharyngectomy. One patient was classified as rT1; 3 as rT2;2 as rT3; and 6 as rT4 in the group of open approaches; in the endoscopic series, 2 patients were rT1, 5 rT2 and one rT3. ResultsIn 3 patients (25%) operated by an open approach (one rT4, one rT3 and one rT2) a complete gross resection was not achieved. Gross total resection was achieved in patients operated by endoscopic surgery. The complication rate in the group operated by an open approach was 92% (5 minor complications, 5 moderate complications, and one serious complication) and in the group that underwent endoscopic surgery all patients had some complication (7 had minor complications and one patient developed a severe complication). Survival at 3 and 5 years was 53% and 42% with the open approach and 100% and 50% with the endoscopic approach, respectively. ConclusionsEndoscopic approaches decrease the morbidity associated with open approaches and allow for favourable oncological control.