Abstract

Circumcision wounds are commonly dressed with paraffin gauze dressings. Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond; Ethicon, US) is increasingly being used for wound closure, as well as wound dressing. This study compared the outcomes of tissue adhesive dressing versus paraffin gauze dressing for circumcision wounds. Adult male patients undergoing circumcision were randomised into two groups: tissue adhesive dressing (study group) or paraffin gauze dressing (control group). They were followed up at two weeks and at two months after surgery. The primary objective of this study was to determine the difference in patient-reported dressing satisfaction at two week follow-up. Our secondary outcomes included operation time, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction, surgeon-reported cosmetic satisfaction, and surgeon-reported objective measure of cosmetic outcome using a validated scale. A cohort of 40 patients was randomised into two equal groups, study and control. Tissue adhesive dressing was associated with a significantly better patient-reported dressing satisfaction, with a mean Likert scale score of 4.53±0.51 for the study group versus 3.20±1.24 for the control group (p<0.001). It was also associated with a significantly better patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction of 4.58±0.51 versus 4.00±1.12 (p<0.05), respectively. There was no difference in operation time, postoperative pain, postoperative complications or surgeon-reported cosmetic outcomes. Tissue adhesive dressing is an acceptable alternative to paraffin gauze dressing for circumcision wounds. This option should be offered to all patients undergoing circumcision.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call