Abstract

Simple SummaryCirculating tumor cells dissociate from the primary tumor, enter the bloodstream and travel to distant sites where they seed metastases. To endow these tumor cells with the features necessary for this journey, they must undergo dramatic shape changes, acquire migratory potential, alter their metabolism, and quickly adapt to insults in each new environment. To permit such phenotypic changes in multiple directions, they often acquire a more primitive state reminiscent of stem cells in the embryo. These changes are coupled with altered capacities and qualities to remove DNA lesions such as those induced by a metabolic shift or an immune cell attack. Defects in DNA repair cause mutations, leading to hereditary breast cancer and accelerating progression. Enhanced DNA repair causes resistance to chemotherapeutic treatment. Therefore, it is of utmost interest to understand the choreography of these functions in circulating tumor cells at the molecular level, because they represent targets to fight chemoresistant metastases.Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) traverse vessels to travel from the primary tumor to distant organs where they adhere, transmigrate, and seed metastases. To cope with these challenges, CTCs have reached maximal flexibility to change their differentiation status, morphology, migratory capacity, and their responses to genotoxic stress caused by metabolic changes, hormones, the inflammatory environment, or cytostatic treatment. A significant percentage of breast cancer cells are defective in homologous recombination repair and other mechanisms that protect the integrity of the replication fork. To prevent cell death caused by broken forks, alternative, mutagenic repair, and bypass pathways are engaged but these increase genomic instability. CTCs, arising from such breast tumors, are endowed with an even larger toolbox of escape mechanisms that can be switched on and off at different stages during their journey according to the stress stimulus. Accumulating evidence suggests that DNA damage responses, DNA repair, and replication are integral parts of a regulatory network orchestrating the plasticity of stemness features and transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states in CTCs. This review summarizes the published information on these regulatory circuits of relevance for the design of biomarkers reflecting CTC functions in real-time to monitor therapeutic responses and detect evolving chemoresistance mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) traverse vessels to travel from the primary tumor to distant organs where they adhere, transmigrate, and seed metastases

  • This review explores the current state of the research dissecting the complex and dynamic molecular network orchestrating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), stemness features and DNA repair in CTCs from metastatic breast cancers (BCs) (MBC) patients

  • We focused on 53BP1, as the DNA end-binding protein 53BP1 is a well-known antagonist of DNA end resection and, thereby, of compensatory, error-prone double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair pathways in homologous recombination (HR)-defective tumor cells such as BRCA1-mutated triple-negative BC (TNBC) [219,220]

Read more

Summary

EMT and DNA Repair

EMT plays an important part in early embryogenesis and wound healing. It is the main process underlying neural crest formation, as well as several other differentiation processes, as, e.g., mesoderm formation. Since the scope of this biological principle is too broad to be covered completely, we would like to refer the reader to comprehensive reviews such as that presented by Yang and Weinberg [20]. This process plays a physiological role during development in the early fetal period, it is hijacked by epithelial tumor cells to acquire mesenchymal features [20]. During this (epithelial-mesenchymal) transition, the cancer cells lose their polarity and organization, typical of epithelial phenotypes, but gain the ability to enter the bloodstream and disseminate

Signaling from the Cellular Surface
Crosstalk between Nuclear DNA Damage Response Components and EMT
Stemness and DNA Repair
Plasticity Causes Stress in CTCs
Sources of DNA Damage in CTCs
CTC-Specific DNA Damage Responses of Breast Cancer Patients
Findings
Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.