Abstract

Simple SummaryMetastases cause the majority of breast cancer-related deaths. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and in particular CTC-clusters, are considered the seeds of metastasis, but their analysis in the early-stages of the disease has so far been limited by the fact that, by using conventional and epithelial-based technologies (as the FDA-approved CellSearch platform), they are more often detected in the metastatic setting. It is known, however, that cancer cells are heterogeneous and can downregulate the expression of epithelial markers, thus limiting the detection capability of epithelial-based technologies. Here, we show that it is possible to increase CTC-cluster detection by using an epithope-independent technology based on blood filtration, and in particular that this strategy allows to detect a high number of CTC-clusters in stage II-III breast cancer patients, before and during neoadjuvant treatment. Our results therefore offer a new opportunity to deepen our understanding of the cancer dissemination process in its early steps.The clinical relevance of circulating tumor cell clusters (CTC-clusters) in breast cancer (BC) has been mostly studied using the CellSearch®, a marker-dependent method detecting only epithelial-enriched clusters. However, due to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, resorting to marker-independent approaches can improve CTC-cluster detection. Blood samples collected from healthy donors and spiked-in with tumor mammospheres, or from BC patients, were processed for CTC-cluster detection with 3 technologies: CellSearch®, CellSieve™ filters, and ScreenCell® filters. In spiked-in samples, the 3 technologies showed similar recovery capability, whereas, in 19 clinical samples processed in parallel with CellSearch® and CellSieve™ filters, filtration allowed us to detect more CTC-clusters than CellSearch® (median number = 7 versus 1, p = 0.0038). Next, samples from 37 early BC (EBC) and 23 metastatic BC (MBC) patients were processed using ScreenCell® filters for attaining both unbiased enrichment and marker-independent identification (based on cytomorphological criteria). At baseline, CTC-clusters were detected in 70% of EBC cases and in 20% of MBC patients (median number = 2, range 0–20, versus 0, range 0–15, p = 0.0015). Marker-independent approaches for CTC-cluster assessment improve detection and show that CTC-clusters are more frequent in EBC than in MBC patients, a novel finding suggesting that dissemination of CTC-clusters is an early event in BC natural history.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMetastatic spreading is the main cause for death in patients diagnosed with cancer

  • Metastatic spreading is the main cause for death in patients diagnosed with cancer.This process is promoted in its initial steps by cancer cells released from the primary tumor into the blood stream

  • CellSieveTM filters include an identification based on marker expression similar to that of CellSearch® (CKpos and CD45neg cells), whereas ScreenCell® filters’ identification is based on cytomorphological evaluation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metastatic spreading is the main cause for death in patients diagnosed with cancer. This process is promoted in its initial steps by cancer cells released from the primary tumor into the blood stream. Being able to interact with other CTCs or with other cells by generating homo- or heterotypic CTC-clusters appears a biologically reasonable solution for increasing the metastatic potential of CTCs once they are facing the hostile blood environment. Functional studies employing animal models and patient-derived data [4,5,6,7] support a role of CTC-clusters in tumor dissemination and metastasis formation in breast cancer (BC)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call