Abstract
e17001 Background: Cancer cells rely on abundant lipid supplies for growth and metastasis. Previous studies have shown that lipid-lowering drugs provide a protective effect against cancer progression, including prostate cancer. However, the role of hyperlipidemic factors has not yet been extensively studied. Here, we aimed to measure circulating levels of hyperlipidemic factors, such as PCSK9 and ANGPTL3, in a small cohort of men diagnosed with high-grade prostate cancer compared to men without cancer. Methods: Plasma samples and data were obtained from 70 consenting men treated at CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Thirty-five patients with high-grade prostate cancer (cases) were age and BMI-matched to 35 patients without cancer (controls). The circulating levels of various lipids, Apo B and Lp(a) were obtained with a Roche Modular analytical platform, whereas levels of PCSK9, ANGPTL3 and leptin were measured by ELISA. We performed group comparisons and correlations using R version 4.2.1. Results: As expected, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were significantly higher in the cancer group. The lipid profile as well as Lp(a) and leptin levels did not differ between groups. ANGPTL3 level tended to be lower in patients with prostate cancer without reaching statistical significance (mean 32.2 vs 36.3 ng/mL, p = 0.051). ANGPTL3 level also inversely correlated with leptin among the cases (rho = -0.44, p = 0.008). PCSK9 level was similar in both groups, but inversely correlated with PSA in the cancer group (rho = -0.39, p = 0.022). PSA level correlated with triglycerides, total cholesterol, Apo B, non-HDL-cholesterol and LDL in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: None of the hyperlipidemic factors measured here was significantly different between high-grade prostate cancer patients and controls. However, the trend for lower ANGPTL3 levels in cancer, as well as the inverse correlations between PCSK9 and PSA and between ANGPTL3 and leptin levels in cancer patients, warrant further investigation in larger cohorts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.