Abstract

In the mammalian brain, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus is considered to be the principal circadian pacemaker, keeping the rhythm of most physiological and behavioral processes on the basis of light/dark cycles. Because restriction of food availability to a certain time of day elicits anticipatory behavior even after ablation of the SCN, such behavior has been assumed to be under the control of another circadian oscillator. According to recent studies, however, mutant mice lacking circadian clock function exhibit normal food-anticipatory activity (FAA), a daily increase in locomotor activity preceding periodic feeding, suggesting that FAA is independent of the known circadian oscillator. To investigate the molecular basis of FAA, we examined oscillatory properties in mice lacking molecular clock components. Mice with SCN lesions or with mutant circadian periods were exposed to restricted feeding schedules at periods within and outside circadian range. Periodic feeding led to the entrainment of FAA rhythms only within a limited circadian range. Cry1−/− mice, which are known to be a “short-period mutant,” entrained to a shorter period of feeding cycles than did Cry2−/− mice. This result indicated that the intrinsic periods of FAA rhythms are also affected by Cry deficiency. Bmal1 −/− mice, deficient in another essential element of the molecular clock machinery, exhibited a pre-feeding increase of activity far from circadian range, indicating a deficit in circadian oscillation. We propose that mice possess a food-entrainable pacemaker outside the SCN in which canonical clock genes such as Cry1, Cry2 and Bmal1 play essential roles in regulating FAA in a circadian oscillatory manner.

Highlights

  • The ability to anticipate periodic food availability is an exception to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) lesion-induced abolition of circadian rhythms [1,2]

  • The mechanism underlying these circadian rhythms is assumed to be a ‘‘food-entrainable circadian oscillation (FEO).’’ In this hypothesis, the food anticipatory activity (FAA) is driven by a FEO, which is entrained to the timing of periodic feeding

  • Circadian Oscillation of the FAA Rhythm – Dependence on the Known Molecular Clock Our study confirms that restricted daily feeding schedules entrain a circadian oscillator located outside the SCN to regulate FAA rhythms, and that this basic mechanism depends on a molecular framework similar to the canonical clock model of transcription-translation feedback loops

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to anticipate periodic food availability is an exception to the SCN lesion-induced abolition of circadian rhythms [1,2]. When food availability is restricted to a short temporal window in the day, animals display prefeeding locomotor activity and feeding-associated physiological changes known as ‘‘food anticipatory activity (FAA)’’. The mechanism underlying these circadian rhythms is assumed to be a ‘‘food-entrainable circadian oscillation (FEO).’’ In this hypothesis, the FAA is driven by a FEO, which is entrained to the timing of periodic feeding. Mutations of genes that are involved in these loops, either singly or in combination, can alter circadian rhythms, producing longperiod, short-period or arrhythmic phenotypes [7]. These clock genes are expressed in a circadian manner in the SCN, and in other parts of the brain and in many peripheral tissues [8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call