Circadian phase shifting: Relationships between photic and nonphotic phase–response curves

Abstract

A variety of photic and nonphotic stimuli can phase-shift the mammalian circadian pacemaker. It has been suggested that the phase–response curves (PRCs) characterizing these diverse stimuli may comprise two major PRC families, one typified by the photic PRC describing the response to brief light pulses, and the other typified by the nonphotic PRC describing the response to stimuli evoking behavioral arousal and/or locomotor activity. Additionally, the mammalian circadian pacemaker can be phase-shifted by dark pulses presented on a constant-light (LL) background. While dark pulse-induced phase shifting was interpreted originally as a mirror-image photic effect, other observations suggest that the dark pulse PRC may instead belong to the family of nonphotic, activity-dependent PRCs. In a recent study, we reexamined the phase-shifting effects of dark pulses in the Syrian hamster, and concluded that the dark pulse PRC reflects both nonphotic and photic mirror-image mechanisms. In the current report, we reanalyze previously published hamster PRC data using polynomial curve-fitting procedures. The results of these analyses reveal that (a) the photic and nonphotic PRCs have identical shape but opposite phasing, and (b) the dark pulse PRC can be modeled by simple summation of nonphotic and photic mirror-image PRCs. This model predicts accurately the shape of the dark pulse PRC, particularly the extension of the phase-advance region into the subjective night.