Abstract

Rats and other species exhibit food-anticipatory activity (FAA) to daily mealtime under circadian (24 h) food access schedules. A critical review of several explanatory models indicates that hourglass clocks and associative learning processes are inadequate to explain many properties of FAA in intact and suprachiasmatic nuclei ablated rodents. A computational learning model, involving circadian clock consultation and phase memory, accounts for some but not all of these properties. An entrainment model, invoking separate, compound food- and light-entrainable oscillators, provides a more complete account of FAA. However, FAA may be simulated best by a model that combines oscillator entrainment with clock consulation and memory for circadian phase. Species as diverse as bees, birds, and mammals appear to share many features of FAA in common; differences may be explained in terms of oscillator organization and the ability to represent multiple circadian phases memorially. Physiological mechanisms of FAA are largely unknown; strategies for localization of entrainment pathways and oscillators, and a modest data base, are reviewed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.