Abstract

Diagnosis of deep-seated bacterial infection remains a serious medical challenge. The situation is becoming more severe with the increasing prevalence of bacteria that are resistant to multiple antibiotic classes. Early efforts to develop imaging agents for infection, such as technetium-99m (99mTc) labeled leukocytes, were encouraging, but they failed to differentiate between bacterial infection and sterile inflammation. Other diagnostic techniques, such as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography, also fail to distinguish between bacterial infection and sterile inflammation. In an attempt to bypass these problems, the potent, broad-spectrum antibiotic ciprofloxacin was labeled with 99mTc to image bacterial infection. Initial results were encouraging, but excitement declined when controversial results were reported. Subsequent radiolabeling of ciprofloxacin with 99mTc using tricarbonyl and nitrido core, fluorine and rhenium couldn't produce robust infection imaging agent and remained in discussion. The issue of developing a robust probe can be approached by reviewing the broad-spectrum activity of ciprofloxacin, labeling strategies, potential for imaging infection, and structure-activity (specificity) relationships. In this review we discuss ways to accelerate efforts to improve the specificity of ciprofloxacin-based imaging.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call