Abstract

The relationship between disability and horror cinema has been complicated. The majority of horror films have associated disability with monstrosity, and represented it as a phenomenon to fear or destroy. Paul Longmore, a leading academic scholar in disability studies, states that according to Hollywood, “the presence of individuals with visible handicaps would alienate consumers from their products,” and is the leading force behind the lack of minority representation in cinema (14). However, changes in the genre are taking place as horror films have begun representing a range of mental and physical disabilities with compassion and sensitivity. Angela Smith, a disabilities and film studies academic scholar, explains that horror cinema frequently “locate[s] horror less in singular and deformed bodies and more in dominant social structures, including the family and American culture,” because disabilities are a literary device to inform the audience about an underlying issue (“Introduction” 24). Moreover, they purposely “force viewers to confront spectacles of impairment as projections of their own socially, scientifically, and cinematically shaped prejudices” (Smith, “Chapter 3” 133). As the presence of disabilities becomes more prominent in horror cinema, so does the audience’s understanding and awareness about mental health issues and physical impairments. Disabilities are identified as a mental or physical condition that makes it difficult for an individual to interact with society the same way a non-disabled person can. This paper analyzes deafness, blindness, schizophrenia, and depression in films that were released over the last decade. The four recent horror films I base my discussion on are John Krasinski’s A Quiet Place (2018), Jennifer Kent’s The Babadook (2014), Pearry Reginald Teo’s The Assent (2019), and Fede Alvarez’s Don’t Breathe (2016). My goal is to show how in aligning the audience with the character’s struggles, they are normalizing and making the audience consciously aware of disabilities in horror films.

Highlights

  • Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema.” Film and Culture, 2011, pp. ix-xvii.Teo, Pearry Reginald, director

  • “Representations of disabled bodies as monstrous and grotesque has changed since the age of classical Hollywood cinema” and continue to evolve (Smit and Enns xiv)

  • Horror films constructed disabled characters as a vulnerable, dependent plot point that rarely takes the primary role in the film

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disability, Eugenics, and Classic Horror Cinema.” Film and Culture, 2011, pp. ix-xvii.Teo, Pearry Reginald, director. Together these three sections will explore how horror films treatment of mental and/or physical disabilities changes the way the nondisabled audience responds to and interacts with the disabled character. Don’t Breathe flips the narrative seen in The Babadook and The Assent by having Rocky, Alex, and Money repress any sounds they make, while the Blind Man’s disability works against the three assailants as they fight to escape.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call