Abstract

3125 Background: The Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Centers Cancer Immunology Data Commons (CIMAC-CIDC) network is a NCI Cancer Moonshots initiative to provide state-of-the-art technology and expertise for immunotherapy clinical trials. Multiplex tissue immunostaining is an integral assay provided that examines density and spatial distribution of immune cells and markers in tissues, for their prognostic or predictive value. Two approaches were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility and subsequently harmonized: chromogenic-based Multiplex Immunohistochemical Consecutive Staining on Single Slide (MICSSS) and Multiplex Immunofluorescence (mIF) based tyramide signal amplification system. Methods: Harmonization was performed across CIMACs (Mount Sinai, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, MD Anderson Cancer Center) in multiple steps to prove that comparable data can be generated independent of site and platform. Goals: 1) harmonize image analysis platforms alone using tissues pre-stained with single chromogenic IHC for CD3 (membrane), Ki67 (nuclear), and CD68 (cytoplasmic), 2) compare image acquisition platforms, 3) streamline Antibody (Ab) clones and assess PD-L1 detection in relation to CLIA- assays, 4) harmonize staining protocols, image acquisition, and analysis platforms on 2 test head and neck tumor samples using MICSSS and mIF, 5) validate harmonization results with a tissue microarray on 27 tissues representing multiple tumors. For last steps, each CIMAC used their platforms for PD-L1, PD-1, CD3, CD8, and pan-cytokeratin (PanCK) staining on one of three consecutive slides from serial sections and compared densities of each marker. Results: Variables as PD-1 Ab clone, positive control reference tissues, sigma value for nuclear segmentation, and use of machine-learning based cell classifier were found to be key to produce accurate, reliable, comparable data. After visual quality control assessment and comparisons of each Region Of Interest (ROI), an overall inter-site Spearman correlation coefficient of ≥0.85 was achieved per marker within each tissue and across tissue types (expect pan-Cytokeratin, ≥0.7), with average coefficient of variation ≤0.1. Conclusions: These results show for the first time that two platforms can deliver harmonized data, despite differences in protocols, platforms, reagents, and analysis tools. Data resulting from retrospective and prospective CIMAC-CIDC analyses may be used with confidence for statistical associations with clinical parameters and outcome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call