Abstract
Background and Objectives: The attentional bias and information processing model explained that individuals who interpret pain stimuli as threatening may increase their attention toward pain-related information. Previous eye tracking studies found pain attentional bias among individuals with chronic pain; however, those studies investigated this phenomenon by using only one stimulus modality. Therefore, the present study investigated attentional engagement to pain-related information and the role of pain catastrophizing on pain attentional engagement to pain-related stimuli among chronic pain patients by utilizing both linguistic and visual stimulus. Materials and Methods: Forty chronic pain patients were recruited from the rehabilitation center, the back pain clinic, and the rheumatology department of Chung-Ang University Hospital in Seoul, Korea. Patients observed pictures of faces and words displaying pain, presented simultaneously with neutral expressions, while their eye movements were measured using the eye tracking system. A t-test and ANOVA were conducted to compare stimulus pairs for the total gaze duration. Results: Results revealed that chronic pain patients demonstrated attentional preference toward pain words but not for pain faces. An ANOVA with bias scores was conducted to investigate the role of pain catastrophizing on attentional patterns. Results indicated that chronic pain patients with high pain catastrophizing scores gazed significantly longer at pain- and anger-related words than neutral words compared to those with low pain catastrophizing scores. The same patterns were not observed for the facial expression stimulus pairs. Conclusions: The results of the present study revealed attentional preference toward pain-related words and the significant role of pain catastrophizing on pain attentional engagement to pain-related words. However, different patterns were observed between linguistic and visual stimuli. Clinical implications related to use in pain treatment and future research suggestions are discussed.
Highlights
Attentional bias toward pain-related information is well established [1]
The present study proposed that (1) chronic pain patients would demonstrate attentional engagement toward pain-related information regardless of types of stimuli presented; (2) attentional engagement toward pain-related information would be maintained across 3000 ms for both pain-related word and pictorial stimuli; and (3) attentional engagement toward pain-related information would be influenced by pain catastrophizing levels for both pain-related word and pictorial stimuli
The current study investigated the attentional engagement to pain-related stimuli for different types of pain-related stimuli among chronic pain patients with musculoskeletal disorders
Summary
The evidence for attentional bias toward pain stimuli has not always been supported and authors argued that the inconsistency in results is due to differences in the methodologies [1,2] These meta-analytic studies found consistent evidence for attentional engagement toward pain-related information for maintained attention at the supraliminal level (i.e., presentation time longer than 1250 ms) but inconsistent results at the subliminal level (i.e., presentation time shorter than 500 ms). The present study investigated attentional engagement to pain-related information and the role of pain catastrophizing on pain attentional engagement to pain-related stimuli among chronic pain patients by utilizing both linguistic and visual stimulus. Different patterns were observed between linguistic and visual stimuli
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
