Abstract

Social isolation is a powerful stressor capable of affecting brain plasticity and function. In the case of breast cancer, previous data indicate that stressful experiences may contribute to a worse prognosis, activating neuroendocrine and metabolism pathways, although the mechanisms underlying these effects are still poorly understood. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that chronic isolation stress (IS) may boost hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity, leading to changes in the hypothalamic expression of genes modulating both mood and metabolism in an animal model of breast cancer. This centrally activated signaling cascade would, in turn, affect the mammary gland microenvironment specifically targeting fat metabolism, leading to accelerated tumor onset. MMTVNeuTg female mice (a model of breast cancer developing mammary hyperplasia at 5 months of age) were either group-housed (GH) or subjected to IS from weaning until 5 months of age. At this time, half of these subjects underwent acute restraint stress to assess corticosterone (CORT) levels, while the remaining subjects were characterized for their emotional profile in the forced swimming and saccharin preference tests. At the end of the procedures, all the mice were sacrificed to assess hypothalamic expression levels of Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf), Neuropeptide Y (NpY), Agouti-Related Peptide (AgRP), and Serum/Glucocorticoid-Regulated Protein Kinase 1 (SgK1). Leptin and adiponectin expression levels, as well as the presence of brown adipose tissue (BAT), were assessed in mammary fat pads. The IS mice showed higher CORT levels following acute stress and decreased expression of NpY, AgRP, and SgK1, associated with greater behavioral despair in the forced swimming test. Furthermore, they were characterized by increased consumption of saccharin in a preference test, suggesting an enhanced hedonic profile. The IS mice also showed an earlier onset of breast lumps (assessed by palpation) accompanied by elevated levels of adipokines (leptin and adiponectin) and BAT in the mammary fat pads. Overall, these data point to IS as a pervasive stressor that is able to specifically target neuronal circuits, mastered by the hypothalamus, modulating mood, stress reactivity and energy homeostasis. The activation of such IS-driven machinery may hold main implications for the onset and maintenance of pro-tumorigenic environments.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women and a leading cause of mortality with over 2 million new cases worldwide diagnosed in 2018 (Bray et al, 2018)

  • When the hedonic profile of female mice that experienced 4 months of social isolation was characterized, we observed an elevated preference toward saccharin consumption in the isolation stress (IS) group when compared with the GH condition [F(1, 9) = 7.844; p = 0.0207], confirming that prolonged social isolation influences response to stimuli associated with reward as previously shown (Berry et al, 2012)

  • The results show that IS increases neuroendocrine responsiveness to further stressors and lead to important changes in the hedonic profile and copying strategies; this behavioral phenotype is accompanied by a strong downregulation of hypothalamic genes involved in stress and metabolic regulations, such as Neuropeptide Y (NpY), AgoutiRelated Peptide (AgRP) and SgK1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women and a leading cause of mortality with over 2 million new cases worldwide diagnosed in 2018 (Bray et al, 2018). In particular, are a recognized risk factor for cancer in the clinic and are linked to breast cancer aggressiveness in animal models (Hermes et al, 2009; Volden et al, 2013). The connection between central stress responses and peripheral target organs triggers a cascade of events involving the activation of a number of neurochemical and inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, modifying cell function/survival, metabolism and behavior, in order to best deal with a stressful challenge (Hayley et al, 2005; Cirulli and Alleva, 2009; Capoccia et al, 2013). It is thought to dysregulate immune function through (i) the suppression of protective immunity, (ii) the enhancement of immunosuppressive mechanisms and (iii) the induction/exacerbation of chronic inflammation (Dhabhar, 2009, 2014, 2018; Antoni and Dhabhar, 2019; Zhang et al, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call