Abstract

Background:Chronic heart failure (HF) disease as an emerging epidemic has a high economic-psycho-social burden, hospitalization, readmission, morbidity and mortality rates despite many clinical practice guidelines’ evidenced-based and consensus driven recommendations that include trials’ initial-baseline data.Objective:To show that the survival and hospitalization-free event rates in the reviewed chronic HF clinical practice guidelines’ class I-A recommendations as initial HF drug therapy (IDT) is possibly a combination and ‘start-to-end’ synergistic effect of the add-on (‘end’) HF drug therapy (ADT) to the baseline (‘start’) HF drug therapy (BDT).Methodology:The references cited in the chronic HF clinical practice guidelines of the 2005, 2009, and 2013 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC), the 2006 Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the 2005, 2008, and 2012 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) were reviewed and compared with the respective guidelines’ and other countries’ recommendations.Results:The BDT using glycosides and diuretics is 79%-100% in the cited HF trials. The survival rates attributed to the BDT (‘start’) is 46%-89% and IDT (‘end’) 61%-92.8%, respectively. The hospitalization-free event rate of the BDT group: 47.1% to 85.3% and IDT group 61.8%-90%, respectively. Thus, the survival and hospitalization-free event rates of the ADT is 0.4%-15% and 4.6% to 14.7%, respectively. The extrapolated BDT survival is 8%-51% based on a 38% estimated natural HF survival rate for the time period109.Conclusion:The contribution of baseline HF drug therapy (BDT) is relevant in terms of survival and hospitalization-free event rates compared to the HF class 1-A guidelines initial drug therapy recommendations (IDT). Further, the proposed initial HF drug (‘end’) therapy (IDT) has possible synergistic effects with the baseline HF drug (‘start’) therapy (BDT) and is essentially the add on HF drug therapy (ADT) in our analysis. The polypharmacy HF treatment is a synergistic effect due to BDT and ADT.

Highlights

  • The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is 1%-2% among adult population in developed countries and 6-10% in the elderly groups

  • The contribution of baseline HF drug therapy (BDT) is relevant in terms of survival and hospitalization-free event rates compared to the HF class 1-A guidelines initial drug therapy recommendations (IDT)

  • The concern is the lack of a statement describing that the Class in and (I-A) recommended initial HF drug (end) therapy (IDT) is an add on HF drug therapy (ADT) to the BDT . 44-65

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is 1%-2% among adult population in developed countries and 6-10% in the elderly groups. It is rising with an estimated 660,000 new cases each year. In China, the HF prevalence increased to 29.1% from 16.9%6. The economic burden of HF remains high7-17, . Guidelines recommendations do not highlight the significant contribution of BDT. The concern is the lack of a statement describing that the Class I-A recommended IDT is an ADT to the BDT . Chronic heart failure (HF) disease as an emerging epidemic has a high economic-psycho-social burden, hospitalization, readmission, morbidity and mortality rates despite many clinical practice guidelines’ evidenced-based and consensus driven recommendations that include trials’ initial-baseline data

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call