Abstract

Habitat selection is strongly influenced by spatial variations in habitat quality and predation risk. Repeated exposure of wildlife to anthropogenic activities in important habitats may affect habitat selection, leading to negative biological consequences. We quantified the cumulative human exposure of a small, genetically isolated and behaviourally constrained spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris) population, off Hawaii Island, and exposure effects on their daytime cumulative activity budget. Dolphins were exposed to human activities within 100 m for 82.7% of the daytime, with a median duration of 10 min between exposure events. Individual dolphins spent on average 61.7% (s.d. = 6.5) of their daytime resting. Of their total rest time, greater than 90% occurred inside sheltered bays. Despite high levels of human exposure, we did not observe an effect on dolphin resting behaviour. The short intervals between exposure events probably prevent dolphins from returning to a natural resting state before the next event. Consequently, ‘control’ observations may represent a resting behaviour of a more vigilant nature. Chronic levels of exposure to human activities could lead to rest deprivation, displacement from preferred resting habitats and ultimately negative population level effects. These results have implications for new proposed legislation aiming to reduce dolphin exposure to human activities.

Highlights

  • Habitat selection is strongly influenced by spatial variations in habitat quality and predation risk

  • Spinner dolphins were exposed to human activities during 82.7% of the time

  • Spinner dolphins were exposed to human activities within 100 m for greater than 82% of the time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Habitat selection is strongly influenced by spatial variations in habitat quality and predation risk. Repeated interactions with humans can lead to changes in many aspects of animal behaviour, influencing activity budgets [7], energetics [8,9], vigilance [10], physiological stress [11,12], reproductive success [13,14], social interactions with conspecifics [15], behavioural patterns [16] and habitat use [17] These effects can have negative impacts on individual vital rates [18,19], resulting in negative consequences for population viability [20,21]. Individuals may have no option but to remain and endure repeated disturbance [17,29,30], which could lead to negative effects on vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.