Abstract

Studies in Polar Base stations, where personnel have no access to sunlight during winter, have reported circadian misalignment, free-running of the sleep-wake rhythm, and sleep problems. Here we tested light as a countermeasure to circadian misalignment in personnel of the Concordia Polar Base station during the polar winter. We hypothesized that entrainment of the circadian pacemaker to a 24-h light-dark schedule would not occur in all crew members (n = 10) exposed to 100–300 lux of standard fluorescent white (SW) light during the daytime, and that chronic non-time restricted daytime exposure to melanopsin-optimized blue-enriched white (BE) light would establish an a stable circadian phase, in participants, together with increased cognitive performance and mood levels. The lighting schedule consisted of an alternation between SW lighting (2 weeks), followed by a BE lighting (2 weeks) for a total of 9 weeks. Rest-activity cycles assessed by actigraphy showed a stable rest-activity pattern under both SW and BE light. No difference was found between light conditions on the intra-daily stability, variability and amplitude of activity, as assessed by non-parametric circadian analysis. As hypothesized, a significant delay of about 30 minutes in the onset of melatonin secretion occurred with SW, but not with BE light. BE light significantly enhanced well being and alertness compared to SW light. We propose that the superior efficacy of blue-enriched white light versus standard white light involves melanopsin-based mechanisms in the activation of the non-visual functions studied, and that their responses do not dampen with time (over 9-weeks). This work could lead to practical applications of light exposure in working environment where background light intensity is chronically low to moderate (polar base stations, power plants, space missions, etc.), and may help design lighting strategies to maintain health, productivity, and personnel safety.

Highlights

  • Amongst other possible zeitgebers such as food, exercise and temperature, light is the strongest synchronizer of the circadian timing system in humans [1,2,3]

  • There was no difference in the intensity of green or IR light received by the participants under standard fluorescent white (SW) and blue-enriched white (BE) light conditions

  • There was no significant difference in irradiance and spectral light composition across BE weeks nor across SW weeks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Amongst other possible zeitgebers such as food, exercise and temperature, light is the strongest synchronizer of the circadian timing system in humans [1,2,3]. An inappropriate light signal leads to circadian misalignment, and neurocognitive, temperature, cardiovascular, immunological, sleep, vigilance and memory alterations [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Peak circadian sensitivity to light is shifted towards the blue region of the spectrum (460 to 480 nm) [15,16,17,21], and corresponds to the recently discovered non-visual melanopsinbased photoreceptive system [22,23,24]. Together with the conventional visual photoreceptors (rods, cones), the melanopsin system conveys photic information to non-visual brain structures such as the biological clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) to allow circadian photo-entrainment [25,26,27,28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call