Abstract
The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) plays a significant shoulder stabilizing role during pitching, with the large forces and repetitions involved in overhead throwing likely contributing to LHBT pathology. Determining whether the LHBT undergoes adaptive changes in baseball pitchers and how these changes relate to bicipital groove morphology can improve our understanding of the biceps function at the glenohumeral joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the chronic adaptations of the bicipital groove morphology and the LHBT in professional baseball pitchers, with a secondary purpose of evaluating biceps integrity as it relates to torsional changes of the bicipital groove. We hypothesized that the throwing arm of professional baseball pitchers would exhibit chronic adaptations of the LHBT compared with their nonthrowing arm, and that these adaptations would be related to the bicipital groove morphology. Fifty-three professional baseball pitchers were enrolled at the beginning of the 2015 Major League Baseball spring training. Ultrasound was used to bilaterally measure humeral retroversion and to capture images of the bicipital groove and the LHBT. MATLAB software was used to calculate the area of the bicipital groove, and ImageJ software was used to quantify the area, echogenicity, and circularity of the LHBT. The dominant arm LHBT cross-sectional area was significantly smaller than the nondominant arm (9 mm2 vs. 10 mm2; P = .011), whereas the dominant arm LHBT echogenicity was significantly higher than the nondominant arm (65 optical density vs. 59 optical density; P = .002). Pitchers with more bicipital groove rotational adaptation (more retroversion) had significantly more LHBT echogenicity adaptation compared with pitchers with less bicipital groove rotational adaptation (12 vs. 2; P = .023). There are significant bilateral differences in the LHBT of professional baseball pitchers. An adaptation in bony rotation was associated with a larger bilateral difference in LHBT echogenicity but was not related to bilateral differences in LHBT area or circularity. Therefore, the bilateral difference in echogenicity is impacted by bony morphology, whereas the bilateral difference in cross-sectional area may be independent of bony morphology in this healthy population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.