Abstract
WHY are writers who approach religious problems from the angle of the sciences so often haphazard in their reasoning, striding forward regardless of obstacles, the moment they quit the strictly scientific beat ? They are as reckless as the theologians who dabble in science, and with less excuse; for their scientific training should have taught them to be more careful. The book before us provokes this question. Not that it is lacking in interest or merit, at all events in its negative contentions. The author is a medical man conversant, both within his professional field and outside of it, with the opinions and needs of the public, especially of the younger generation. He knows how their outlook upon the larger problems of life has been prejudiced by uncritical acceptance of the dogmatic tradition of Victorian science, a tradition which still dominates popular thinking, despite the fact that recent developments in physics have gone far to undermine its dogmatism. The majority of the students in our secondary schools and universities still echo the outworn shibboleths and are convinced before their mindsare fully fledged that science has scotched religion. It is to such as these, and not to specialist readers, that the author addresses himself. Christianity and the Mechanists By Dr. W. Osborne Greenwood. Pp. 296. (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode (Publishers), Ltd., 1941.) 9s. net.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.