Abstract
This paper examines the understudied Middle English Titus and Vespasian, a fall-of- Jerusalem narrative that fictionalizes the historical Roman occupation and siege of the city circa 70 CE. While the poem follows roughly the same narrative trajectory as the more widely read Siege of Jerusalem, it fictionalizes these events at three times the length, incorporating considerably more episodes of anthropophagy, graphic suffering, and gruesome violence. I argue that Titus and Vespasian amplifies the antisemitic violence of poems such as Siege in order to validate such action as appropriate and proper Christian behavior. By presenting violence against Jewish bodies as a crucial element of the Roman emperor Vespasian’s conversion process, the poem constructs a notion of Christian orthodoxy that fuses violence and imperial power to Christian piety. Thus, Titus and Vespasian champions discourses of Christian imperialism that circulated throughout later medieval England, narratives that foster more circumspect but no less insidious antisemitic theologies into the present.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.