Christian Humanism in the Age of Critical Philology: Ralph Häfner's Gods in Exile

Abstract

Hauler's book is a monumental study and a milestone of Germ an -language research.1 He delineates, for the first time, a comprehensive picture of the Christian humanism of European philologists in the era of criticism. Recovering an immense wealth of forgotten sources, the book reveals the complex interaction and tension between pagan mythology and Christian culture in philological controversies. Though authors might denounce the pagan histories of gods as fabulae, they were constitutive for the productive and emulative reception of ancient Greco-Roman patterns in and Baroque culture. How could the peculiar logic of this paganizing be handled? Was it advisable to have faith in the integrative power of Christian truth, which was capable of finding precursors or even proofs of one's own truth in pagan patterns, or should the pagan be selectively separated from the Christian? And what was the role of philology in this process? Did the growing expertise in criticism advance the process of dissociation of paganism and Christianity? Did it further new possibilities of synthesis in the spirit of Apologetics?The reconstruction of these processes involves much more than what the book's very specific title suggests. It is a large-scale history of scholarship written from the perspective of the most important tensions that Christian humanism had to overcome in its final stage. From an Anglo-American perspective, this book contributes to recent reconstructions of ideas of early modern men of learning, as well as the growing number of studies on antiquarianism and the history of religion.2 The final stage of Christian humanism, the period of time covered by the book, begins in the late sixteenth century and ends in the 1730s, a point in time which Hamer presents, with some justification, as the end of an era.HYMNOLOGY AND POLYMATHYThe study consists of three basic parts. The first one is the Persistence of Orphic-Platonic Hymnology in Christian Humanism (Fortleben der orphisch-platonischen Hymnologie im christlichen Humanismus). This topic, apparently very specialized and marginal, proves to be a key arena of early modern scholarship, an arena traversed by the battle lines between pagan tradition and Christianity as well as between poetry and theology. Were hymns inspired poetry? What kind of inspiration could and should be conceded to hymns to Jupiter and the sun? Of course, those humanists who reappropriated Orphism and Neo-Platonism were interested in this genre. In the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, and even into the midsixteenth century, this was not yet a problem. However, the more philological consciousness (and confessionalization) evolved, the more the genre's scope was delimited. What scope remained? Hafner relates the problem to the revival of an eclectic in the wake of the Second Sophistic. This eclectic Platonism, which was particularly influential from 1500 on, combined Platonism with rhetorics, and the claim of comprehensive polymathy with the joyful presentation of the findings of reading. In this respect, Apuleius and Aulus Gellius were two model authors for early modern polyhistors. We must include Martianus Capella as a continuation of the Renaissance of the Second Sophistic into Early Christian Encyclopedism (Renaissance der Zweiten Sophistik bis in die fruhchristliche Enzyklopadie hinein, p. 18).Hafner's approach is starkly original and, in my opinion, highly productive for the current debates about early modern encyclopedism and cultures of knowledge that are sometimes deadlocked.3 Too frequently, polymathy is used synonymously for encyclopedism, which is often associated with modern concepts of systematic classification. Yet, according to Hamer, this is a misunderstanding. It neglects the playful elements and skillful rhetorical options of throwing questions out into the open rather than narrowing them dogmatically. Perhaps the only addition to Hafner's sources could have been Louis de Cressolles's Theatrum veterum Rhetorutn, which, according to Marc Fumaroli in L'âge de l'eloquence, marked the return of the Second Sophistic. …