Choroidal Line Scan Measurements in Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography as Surrogates for Volumetric Thickness Assessment

Abstract

To compare choroidal thickness of different areas on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SSOCT) line and cube scans for their interchangeable use. Validity analysis. SSOCT line and cube scans were obtained from 21 patients with various choroidal thicknesses. Subfoveal center point choroidal thickness, mean central millimeter choroidal thickness, and mean 6-mm-area choroidal thicknesses were obtained from both eyes by2 independent graders in a reading center setting. Cross-correlations were performed using Passing and Bablok regression models. A 95% confidence interval of slope that included 1 was considered to indicate no significant difference. Average choroidal thickness of center point, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid subfields, and total grid area of 6mm on both scans and the correlation between different areas served as main outcome measures. No significant difference between line scans/corresponding subfields of cube scans (outer nasal 0.92-1.11, inner nasal 0.88-1.06, central 0.94-1.11, inner temporal 0.95-1.12, outer temporal 0.93-1.17). No significant difference between subfoveal center point measurement/mean of choroidal thickness in the central millimeter of cube scans (0.89-1.08). Significant difference of subfoveal center point measurement or mean of central millimeter area of cube scans to entire 6-mm area of cube scans (1.01-1.53 and 1.03-1.38). Measurements on a single SSOCT horizontal line scan can represent the entire choroid but subfoveal center point measurements are only indicative for the central millimeter area. There is a consistent overestimation of choroidal thickness when trying to estimate overall choroidal thickness from any central measurement.