Abstract
Women of the baby-boom generation are the first generation of women to present an old age-retirement trajectory similar to the traditional male model. Using a narrative approach, we collected 20 life stories from older women, mostly retired, all born in Canada. We present five patterns that influenced respondents’ decisions to end their career or, inversely, postpone the moment of retirement: 1) “Choosing myself” to fully take advantage of the retirement years; 2) Rational retirement: the deliberate choice to stop paid employment and mourn one’s career; 3) The break: obligation to retire; 4) Retirement as an extension of the retirement of a spouse-breadwinner, and 5) Postponing retirement. Our analysis reveals that patterns vary, depending on socio-economic contexts and state of health, relationship to work, spouse’s retirement status, care work, and the desire for freedom. They also reflect life-long social roles associated with care work, remunerated work, housework, and civic commitments. The Aging-retirement trajectory depends on women’s collective and individual histories and the impact of gender on other intersecting social relations.
Highlights
Women are more affected by other issues, such as care work, for which they remain primarily responsible, whether as the primary care-giving parent or as a close caregiver (Ginn, Street & Arber, 2001; Mc Daniel, 2007; Vanier Institute of the family, 2017)
33 What most interested us in considering these five patterns was the analysis of the contexts, individual and collective experiences, and social relations underlying these decisional or event patterns that lead to retirement
Women who have evolved according to the traditional male breadwinner-female caretaker model, even after having held paid employment for a large part of their lives, are more likely to make a rational choice to retire, because of the predominance of care work, with the arrival of grandchildren
Summary
Women are more affected by other issues, such as care work, for which they remain primarily responsible, whether as the primary care-giving parent or as a close caregiver (Ginn, Street & Arber, 2001; Mc Daniel, 2007; Vanier Institute of the family, 2017). These specific realities that circumscribe women’s life courses naturally shape their retirement experiences (Gambold, 2013; Newton, Chauhan, Spirling & Stewart, 2018; Prince; 2000; Price & Nesteruk, 2010)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
