Abstract
ABSTRACT Multi-group Bayesian structural equation modeling (MG-BSEM) gained considerable attention among substantive researchers investigating cross-group differences and methodologists exploring challenges in measurement invariance testing. MG-BSEM allows for greater flexibility by applying elastic rather than strict equality constraints on item parameters across groups. This, however, requires a specification of user-defined prior variances for cross-group differences in item parameters. Although prior selection in general Bayesian settings is well-studied, guidelines with respect to tuning the normal prior variances in MG-BSEM approximate measurement invariance (AMI) analysis are still largely missing. In a Monte Carlo simulation study we find that correctly specifying prior variances results in more precise credibility intervals (CI) and posterior standard deviations, while prior misspecification has little influence on point estimates. We compared the BIC, DIC, and PPP fit measures and found in our simulation scenarios that the DIC measure was most effective, when a proper threshold for model selection was applied.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
