Abstract
A shortage of COVID-19 vaccines and reports of side-effects led several countries to recommend a heterologous regimen for second vaccine doses. This study aimed to describe the reasons behind individuals’ choices of a homologous or a heterologous second vaccination. This cross-sectional study enrolled individuals under 60 who had received a first dose of Vaxzevria and could choose between a homologous or heterologous regimen for their second dose. Quantitative (socio-demographic, clinical characteristics) and qualitative data were collected and analysed through a generalized linear model and thematic analysis, respectively. Of the 1437 individuals included in the analysis, the majority (76.1%) chose a heterologous second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination. More females chose a heterologous vaccination regimen (p = 0.003). Younger individuals also tended to choose heterologous vaccination (p < 0.001). The main motivation in favour of heterologous vaccination was to follow the Italian Ministry of Health recommendations (n = 118; 53.9%). This study showed that most individuals, mainly younger people and females, chose a heterologous dose of COVID-19 vaccination after their first viral vector vaccine. Heterologous vaccinations could be an effective public health measure to control the pandemic as they are a safe and efficient alternative to homologous regimens.
Highlights
Since the first months of 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the entire world severely
Out of the 1602 individuals aged
Of the 1437 individuals included in the analysis, the majority (76.1%) chose a heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimen
Summary
Since the first months of 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the entire world severely. Many countries are still struggling with this global emergency [1]. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing, wearing personal protective equipment [2], quarantine, isolation, and lockdown measures have been at the forefront of outbreak control [3]. These measures were quickly strengthened, the outbreak continued to increase, causing severe consequences that negatively affected socio-economic activity [4] and health-related outcomes [5]. Despite all efforts made to limit virus transmission, active immunisation against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by vaccination is currently the cornerstone of global healthcare policies against COVID-19 [6].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International journal of environmental research and public health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
