Abstract
The purpose of this instructional piece was to provide a nontechnical synthesis of common internal consistency reliability estimates used in professional counseling and in related fields. The article begins with an overview of coefficients alpha, omega, omega hierarchical, and H, with guidelines for their selection. Next, I provide recommendations for interpretive cutoff scores for higher and lower stakes testing followed by commentary on the limitations of relying too heavily on such guidelines. I discuss the importance of reporting confidence intervals (CIs) for reliability estimates to enhance reliability generalizations. When evaluating internal consistency reliability estimates of scores based on sample data counselors are advised to (a) determine the intended use of test scores in terms of higher or lower stakes testing, (b) take a multifaceted approach and consider the requirements of each reliability index, (c) include CIs, and (d) refer to interpretive cutoff scores as tentative general guidelines, not absolute standards.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
