Abstract

The interplay between a receiver's sensory system and a sender's courtship signals is fundamental to the operation of sexual selection. Male courtship signals that match a female receiver's preexisting perceptual biases can be favored yet the message they communicate is not always clear. Do they simply beacon the male's location or also indicate his quality? We explored this question in a species of fiddler crab Uca terpsichores that courts under elevated predation risk and that mates and breeds underground in the safety of males' burrows. Sexually receptive females leave their own burrows and are thereby exposed to avian predators as they sequentially approach several courting males before they choose one. Males court by waving their single greatly enlarge claw and sometimes by building a sand hood next to their burrow entrance. Hoods are attractive because they elicit a risk‐reducing orientation behavior in females, and it has been suggested that claw waving may also serve primarily to orient the female to the male. If the wave communicates male quality, then females should discriminate mates on the basis of variation in elements of the wave, as has been shown for other fiddler crabs. Alternatively, variation in elements of the claw waving display may have little effect on the display's utility as a beacon of the location of the male and his burrow. We filmed courting males and females under natural conditions as females responded to claw waving and chose mates. Analysis of the fine‐scale courtship elements between the males that females rejected and those they chose revealed no differences. When predation risk during courtship is high, males' courtship displays may serve primarily to guide females to safe mating and breeding sites and not as indicators of male quality apart from their roles as beacons.

Highlights

  • Preexisting biases in female sensory systems can play an important role in the evolution of mating signals (Ryan & Cummings, 2013)

  • The male mate-­attraction signal is very similar to the high frequency calls of their bat predators and females show a startle response on hearing the male signal: they vibrate their legs which moves the leaf they are standing on, allowing

  • We studied a population of Uca terpsichores on the mudflats of the Base Naval Vasco Nuñez de Balboa, Panama (8°56′55′′N; 79°34′25′′W) in December 2013–January 2014

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Preexisting biases in female sensory systems can play an important role in the evolution of mating signals (Ryan & Cummings, 2013). Signals that capture the female’s attention reveal the male’s location and identity (Reichert, 2015; Stamps & Barlow, 1973) and the location of his burrow (Christy & Salmon, 1991) where the female may shelter temporarily from predators (Peso, Curran & Backwell, 2016; Ribeiro, Christy, Rissanen, & Kim, 2006) Males increase their wave rate when they detect wandering females, and this further increases their conspicuousness and locatability (Milner, Jennions, & Backwell, 2010; Sanches & Backwell, In Prep.). Higher waves, and leading waves are expensive to produce and are likely candidates for mate choice of male quality (Mowles, 2014) They are all likely to increase male detectability and locatability (Ryan & Cummings, 2005). By video recording natural female approaches to courting males, we were able to compare the two males for the number of waves and drums given, the structure of their waves and drums, their size, their ability to produce leading waves, and the possession of a sand hood

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call