Abstract
AbstractMean–Variance (M–V) is the most popular investment rule employed by both practitioners and researches. For a short-planned investment horizon, this rule generally conforms with expected utility paradigm. However, for a relatively long horizon, generally more than one year, the distributions of returns become positively skewed, hence the M–V rule loses ground. As the horizon increases, by the M–V rule one needs (mistakenly) to increase the weight of bonds in the stock–bond portfolio, e.g., almost 100% in bonds for a 30-year horizon. Expected utility maximization recommending almost 100% in stocks for long horizons. This, gap is of crucial importance, because life expectancy is increasing, implying longer investment horizons. For long horizons the mean–coefficient-of-variance rule conforms with expected utility, as the distributions are close to log-normal. For intermediate horizons one should employ stochastic dominance or direct expected utility maximization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
