Choices between segmented and unsegmented schedules and the self-control paradigm

Abstract

A concurrent-chains procedure was used to examine choice between a segmented (two- or three-terminal-link segments schedules) and an unsegmented schedule (simple schedule) in terminal links with equal interreinforcement intervals. In most such experiments, preference for the unsegmented schedule has been found, but in a recent study with humans (Alessandri et al., 2010) a reversal in preference was found when, in the segmented schedule, the terminal link segmenting stimulus was presented briefly and closer to food delivery such that the early terminal link stimulus was temporally closer to the food delivery. In Experiment 1, an attempt to replicate this latter effect with pigeons was unsuccessful but this outcome was consistent with an account in terms of a self-control contingency involving conditioned reinforcers. According to this account, the unsegmented alternative consisted of an immediate, smaller presentation of a conditioned reinforcer (i.e., the impulsive, and thus usually the preferred, option in several experiments) and the segmented schedule led to a delayed, larger conditioned reinforcer (i.e., the self-control option). In Experiment 2, a reversal of preference toward the segmented schedule was found when a delay was added to both terminal links between the reinforced initial-link response and the onset of the corresponding terminal link stimulus. This result is consistent with a similar effect found with primary reinforcers in the self-control literature suggesting the utility of self-control as an account of preferences for unsegmented terminal links of concurrent chains schedules.