Abstract

Abstract We propose and axiomatize the categorical thinking model (CTM) in which the framing of the decision problem affects how agents categorize alternatives, that in turn affects their evaluation of it. Prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization is an underlying mechanism of key departures from the neoclassical model of choice. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioural foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013, Journal of Political Economy, 121, 803–843) that highlights its strong predictions and distinctions from other models.

Highlights

  • Categories shape how people perceive and react to the world

  • We propose and axiomatize the categorical thinking model (CTM) based on two key features of these examples: categorization depends on the context and affects how the decision maker

  • We show that a number of important models across different choice environments are special cases of CTM

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Categories shape how people perceive and react to the world. A real estate agent shows clients a house in a worse neighbourhood before showing them the one the agent wants to sell, so that they categorize the target’s neighbourhood as a gain rather than a loss. While we initially consider exogenously specified categories, our framework has the advantage of allowing categories to be derived endogenously from choice behaviour.[1] We provide a method to identify the categorization based on the changes in trade-offs between attributes This allows our model to consider phenomena for which the psychology makes only partial category predictions, like salience. We apply our results to provide the first complete characterization of the observable choice behaviour equivalent to BGS, clarifying and identifying the nature of the assumptions used by it.[2] The first crucial step towards understanding the model is understanding its novel salience function that determines which attribute stands out for a given reference point.

Psychology of categorization
Categorical thinking model
Time preference
Social preferences
BEHAVIOURAL FOUNDATION FOR CTM
Reweighting
Behavioural foundation for Affine CTM
Behavioural foundation for Strong CTM
Comparing models of riskless choice
Revealing categories
BGS MODEL AND CATEGORIES
CHOICE CORRESPONDENCE
Reference point formation
Behavioural foundations for Strong-CTM
Behavioural foundations for BGS
RELATED LITERATURE
Proof for Theorem 2
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof of Theorem 4
Examples from Table 1
Other CTM
Other models and CTM
Proof of Proposition 1
A.10. Proof of Proposition 3
The category function
A.13. Proof of Theorem 5
Axioms for c
Proof of Theorem 6
Proof of Proposition 4
Proof of Proposition 5
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.