Abstract
RETRACTED ARTICLE Relevance. Surgical treatment of neoplasms, various genetic disorders and facial trauma often contribute to a violation of the general aesthetic perception of a person and the development of dysfunctions [1]. The main difficulty of reconstructive treatment in the maxillofacial area is a clear understanding of the anatomical and topographic landmarks and three-dimensional relationships of organs and tissues from each other. Purpose. Development of an algorithm for the use of various types of extraoral implants for various total facial defects. Materials and methods. The collection and analysis of clinical material was carried out in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery on the basis of the Samara Regional Clinical Hospital named after V.I. V.D. Seredavina. From 2015 to the present, we have installed 104 extraoral implants of various designs for the rehabilitation rehabilitation of fifty patients suffering from total facial defects of various lengths. Conclusions. The analysis of our study showed that the use of extraoral implants of various designs for total facial defects of various lengths, taking into account individual anatomical and topographic features, the etiology of the total defect, has demonstrated its clinical effectiveness.
Highlights
The analysis of our study showed that the use of extraoral implants of various designs for total facial defects of various lengths, taking into account individual anatomical and topographic features, the etiology of the total defect, has demonstrated its clinical effectiveness
Assessment of Stability of Craniofacial Implants by resonant Frequency Analysis
Summary
Именно благодаря изучению процессов остеоинтеграции дентальных имплантатов стало возможно применять полученные знания в анапластологии для фиксации эпитезов ушной раковины [2]. Анализ литературы по изучению приживаемости и срока службы экстраоральных имплантатов для фиксации эктопротезов челюстно-лицевой области позволил сделать заключение, что качественная интеграция экстраоральных имплантатов тесно связана с топографией имплантации и наличию/отсутствию рентгенотерапии при лечении онкологического заболевания. При инсталляции экстраорального имплантата в височную кость остеоинтеграция составляет от 95 % до 98,8 % (при отсутствии рентгенотерапии) и от 82,2 % до 86,1 % при курсах рентгенотерапии при лечении онкозаболевания. Стремление ускорить реабилитацию пациентов с тотальными дефектами лица способствовало поиску новых вариаций экстраоральных имплантатов с остеофиксаторным принципом крепления [3].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
