Abstract
Objective To investigate the evaluation standard and proper time point of anti-tuberculosis trial for differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and Crohn's disease (CD). Methods Clinical data and endoscopic changes of 28 patients with confirmed ITB and Ⅱ with confirmed CD, who underwent anti-tuberculosis trail, were retrospectively analyzed. Results No significant difference could be found in clinical characteristics of ITB and CD patients on baseline, such as active pulmonary tuberculosis, strong positive skin test and anal fistula/perianal abscess. Clinical symptoms were relieved in beth groups right after anti-tuberculosis treatment. After 3 months of treatment, the no-improvement rate in ITB group was O, whereas that of CD group was 27. 3% (P =0. 004). The disappearance rate plus improvement rate of ulcer in ITB group was 90. 9% (20/22) plus 9. 1% (2/22) and 100% (28/28) plus 0 at 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. The disappearance rate plus improvement rate of nodular lesion was 58. 8% (10/17) plus 41.2% (7/17) and 76. 5% (13/17) plus 23.5% (4/17), respectively. There was no obvious improvement of active ulcer or nodular transformation in CD group at any time point (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion With deficiency of special index for differential diagnosis of ITB and CD, some cases hard to differentiate still have to accept anti-tuberculosis treatment. Three months of anti-tuberculosis treatment is a proper time point to evaluate the efficacy. Disappearance of active ulcer and nodular transformation, together with cure or obvious improvement in clinic are taken as effective for treatment trail. Key words: Tuberculosis,gastrointestinal; Crohn disease ; Antitubercular; Differential
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.