Abstract

Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge, considered as an intermediate between oriental and occidental pear groups, is one of the most important wild pear species. The number of its populations is decreasing because of habitat destruction, fragmentation, and continuous exploitation, so protection and conservation measures are urgently needed. Assessment of its genetic diversity and phylogeography are imperative for its efficient conservation. Two chloroplast DNA intergenic fragments were used to detect genetic diversity and phylogeography of 320 individuals from 18 wild P. betulaefolia populations. Haplotype variation, genetic differentiation, and historical events of the populations were estimated. The results showed that P. betulaefolia populations sampled in northern China contained a high level of genetic diversity (H T = 0.826). A significant isolation-by-distance value (r = 0.587, P < 0.001, 1,000 permutations) among all 18 populations indicated a correlation between genetic divergence and geographic distance. Four population groups were identified in a neighbor-joining tree based on the genetic distance. Analyses of molecular variation showed that the genetic variation mainly existed among population groups, representing 64.61 % of the total variation. Phylogeographic analyses indicated that the populations of P. betulaefolia experienced a scenario of rapid range expansion, which probably occurred between 608,000 and 204,580 years ago. Meanwhile, both the restricted gene flow with isolation by distance and allopatric fragmentation were crucial processes responsible for shaping the genetic patterns of P. betulaefolia. The occurrence of specific haplotypes might be ascribed to an ancestral introgression or joint retention of an ancestral polymorphism with other Pyrus species at the northern edge of the distribution of P. betulaefolia. Three populations displaying a high level of haplotype diversity and unique haplotypes were assumed to be relict populations of Quaternary glaciation and should have conservation priority. Three additional large populations should also be preferentially protected by building natural preservation zones.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call