Abstract

Enantioseparations in nonaqueous capillary electrochromatography (CEC) are reported in this study for the first time, using wide-pore aminopropyl silica gel coated with helically chiral poly(diphenyl-2-pyridylmethyl methacrylate) (PDPM) as chiral stationary phase (CSP). The anodic electroosmotic flow (EOF) in a methanolic solution of ammonium acetate was used for the migration of neutral analytes through the packed bed in the capillaries. Four different techniques, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in common-size columns, capillary HPLC, pressure-assisted CEC and CEC were compared from the viewpoint of separation parameters. The latter three were performed with the same experimental setup, varying the relative contribution of the pressure-driven and the electrically driven flow to the overall mobility of the analyte. Capillary HPLC offers clear advantages compared to enantioseparations in common-size columns. However, for a given particle size of the packing material, CEC was not obviously advantageous compared to pressure-driven separations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call