Abstract
The validity of DIS-CM (Chinese modified version of Diagnostic Interview Schedule) was examined by analyzing lifetime prevalence of each age group, age at onset, and recency of illness. The magnitude of the discrepancy between the empirical and the estimated data was adopted as the criterion of the degree of deviation. Manic and depressive episodes were found to be seriously underestimated. Schizophrenic, panic, phobic and antisocial personality disorders were probably underestimated. The observed lifetime prevalence figures with DIS-CM are rather conservative for these disorders. The prevalence data of a recent 1-year period are less biased and more reliable. The nature of the disease, recall effect, active or passive psychological resistance, mortality, and uncooperative attitude are considered factors that induce an underestimate of lifetime prevalence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
