Abstract

The study of Chinese political economy has experienced a sea change since the late 1990s; instead of debating the origins and direction of national reform, scholars have turned to examining the origins of local economic variation. This article reviews recent work in the regional political economy of contemporary China. In keeping with a movement in comparative politics toward analyzing subnational politics, the “new regionalists” seek to identify and explain meaningful heterogeneity in the Chinese polity and economy. Yet they go further than simply using subnational cases to generate or test theories about Chinese politics. Instead, they propose that subnational political economies in China are a function of endogenous change rather than a reaction to national priorities. After identifying differences between the “new regionalism” and previous studies of decentralization in China, the author discusses this work according to the theoretical approaches (institutional, ideational, and sociohistorical) used to explain the origins of regional differences. She concludes by examining the limitations of the new regionalist agenda in comparative and historical context and suggesting that scholars move past unconditional acceptance of the causal power of “socialist legacies” and instead attend to the importance of changes in the post-Mao administrative hierarchy.

Highlights

  • I am grateful to Rawi Abdelal, Nara Dillon, Rick Doner, Kyle Jaros, Kristen Looney, Ben Read, and especially Sebastian Heilmann for comments on various drafts

  • The study of Chinese political economy has undergone a sea change since the late 1990s; instead of debating the origins and direction of national reform, scholars have turned to examining the origins of local economic variation

  • I conclude by examining the limitations of the new regionalist agenda in comparative and historical context and suggesting that scholars move past unconditional acceptance of the causal power of “socialist legacies” and instead attend to the importance of changes in the post-Mao administrative hierarchy

Read more

Summary

Disaggregating Economies in China and Beyond

I take stock of six books that bring regional variation in patterns of growth, innovation, and investment to the fore in research on the political economy of reform and development in China All of these authors, though they analyze phenomena as diverse as industrial policy, property rights, labor politics, and rural. Poverty, take regional variation as the basis for subnational comparison and identify local—as opposed to national—level political factors as key independent variables In this sense, they are interested in variation in economic outcomes, but variation in local economic orders, or the very logic of economic decision-making and patterns of behavior.[12] Importantly, these authors do not treat all subnational units as equal or even similar; instead, they emphasize fundamental differences in regional political arrangements, economic institutions, and relations to the center.

Beyond Decentralization
Limitations and Opportunities of the New Regionalism
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call