Abstract

China’s leaders often claim that the rising tide of mass protests in recent years is primarily driven by popular anger over the widening gap between rich and poor. However, in a series of national surveys that I helped direct, it becomes clear the average Chinese citizen is less angry about current income gaps than citizens in many other societies. There also is no clear increase in such anger over time (despite a sustained rise in income inequality). The primary drivers of popular anger lie elsewhere—primarily in power inequalities, manifested in abuses of power, official corruption, bureaucrats who fail to protect the public from harm, mistreatment by those in authority, and inability to obtain redress when mistreated. China’s leaders have done an impressive job in recent years of addressing poverty and material inequality, thus keeping the distributive injustice social volcano dormant. However, they have so far been unwilling or unable to make fundamental reforms to address procedural injustices. Unless they can provide Chinese citizens with more effective protections from the arbitrariness and abuses of entrenched power, a shared sense of injustice will persist, and this active volcano will continue to smolder, with the potential to erupt and threaten Party rule.

Highlights

  • China’s leaders often claim that the rising tide of mass protests in recent years is primarily driven by popular anger over the widening gap between rich and poor

  • There is considerable debate about the accuracy and comparability of the figures cited on mass protests in China over the years, there is little doubt that they have become increasingly common and occa

  • My refutation formed the core of my 2010 book Myth of the Social Volcano.[16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

China’s leaders often claim that the rising tide of mass protests in recent years is primarily driven by popular anger over the widening gap between rich and poor. My refutation formed the core of my 2010 book Myth of the Social Volcano.[16] In general my colleagues and I found that there was surprisingly little sign of anger about current patterns of income inequality in China and that in many respects Chinese survey respondents were more accepting of those patterns and more optimistic about their personal chances of getting ahead than their counterparts in other countries.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call