Abstract

This study focuses on China's A-share market and investigates the existence and underlying source of the illiquidity premium. We observe a significant and positive relationship between stock illiquidity and expected returns. Moreover, relative to illiquid stocks, liquid stocks are more susceptible to overpricing during high sentiment periods and earn lower abnormal returns following high sentiment periods, thus supporting the sentiment-driven mispricing explanation. We also find evidence that the illiquidity premium fails to reflect exposure to underlying risk. Overall, China's illiquidity premium derives from mispricing instead of risk-taking.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.