Abstract

Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. However, it remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. This study therefore advanced previous research by examining whether the shoulder-racket distance is associated with performance. We also improved our understanding of how the shoulder-racket distance is controlled by including the hand-racket segment in our biomechanical model. Twenty-one children performed 40 forehands in a hitting for accuracy task. Participants were randomly divided into two groups—a scaled equipment group and a full-sized equipment group. Results revealed that the shoulder-racket distance was a performance variable, as evidenced by: (a) its variance reduced closer to ball impact, (b) its distance at ball impact, but not at the start of the forward swing, differentiated good from poor performance, and (c) its distance was similar for both groups, implying that there was a “sweet spot” for striking a ball, regardless of racket size. We also showed that it is the shoulder-racket vector in state-space (i.e., distance and angle) that differentiates good from poor performance. Finally, the manner in which the shoulder-racket distance was controlled differed between the groups, with scaled equipment promoting a more distal control than full-sized equipment. Implications for skill acquisition are discussed.

Highlights

  • Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions

  • The scaled racket allowed a longer lever during the swing, but at ball impact both rackets were guided to a distance about 0.3 of arm length

  • There was a main effect for score ­(F1,874 = 21.48, p < 0.01) but no main effect for group ­(F1,874 = 2.63, p = 0.105). Both the scaled and full-sized groups had a higher shoulder-racket distance in HIGH compared to LOW scores at ball impact (Fig. 1C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. We reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. It remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. When children used a smaller tennis racket and a softer ball, variance in the distance between the shoulder and the racket was explained by the coupling of the upper arm and forearm angles In other words, these segments worked in unison, whereby variability in one segment was compensated by variability in the other segment. This study was significant as it was the first to investigate the effect of equipment scaling on children’s movement coordination in a multi-articular action

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.