Abstract

Katherine Mansfield’s story of a white (Pakeha) child kidnapped by Maori women and taken to their community is formally distinguished by its creation of a ‘naive’ perspective on colonialism through the use of a young child as the narrative focalizer. The story illuminates and problematizes the historical question of the place of children in empire. With reference to works by Stevenson and Ballantyne, this essay discusses the relation between Mansfield’s short story and the nineteenth-century tradition of imperial adventure fiction featuring child protagonists. It additionally compares the childhood perspective on colonialism offered by Mansfield with the ‘authorized’ perspectives presented in imperial literature specifically produced for child readers by publishing outlets such as the Religious Tract Society. Mansfield’s story, it will be seen, unsettles a hegemonic tradition of using children to filter an ‘innocent’ perspective on the colonial other. The question of the other is the major theoretical issue explored in this story, which explores the dynamic of ‘othering’ in an imperial context as a two-way, mutually determining process. Pearl is as exotic to her Maori hosts as they are to her. By leaving unresolved the question of the kidnappers’ motives, the story presents empire as an indeterminate space of mutual fear and desire between colonizers and colonized.

Highlights

  • Katherine Mansfield’s story of a white (Pakeha) child kidnapped by Maori women and taken to their community is formally distinguished by its creation of a ‘naïve’ perspective on colonialism through the use of a young child as the narrative focalizer

  • Distinguished by its use of a young child as the narrative focalizer, the story offers an artfully naïve perspective on an inter-racial encounter, and in the process unsettles some of the basic ideological underpinnings of colonialism

  • The status of ‘How Pearl Button was Kidnapped’ as an imperial short story is complicated by its engagement with two historical contexts, the tradition of colonial adventure fiction and the discourse of child rescue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Katherine Mansfield’s story of a white (Pakeha) child kidnapped by Maori women and taken to their community is formally distinguished by its creation of a ‘naïve’ perspective on colonialism through the use of a young child as the narrative focalizer. The status of ‘How Pearl Button was Kidnapped’ as an imperial short story is complicated by its engagement with two historical contexts, the tradition of colonial adventure fiction and the discourse of child rescue.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call