Abstract

Notions of childhood in colonial Australia were informed by a variety of social contexts that varied across time and space and were given material expression in the memorialization of children’s burials. Using data drawn from two studies of nineteenth-century cemeteries in rural South Australia, in this paper, we suggest an alternative way to understand children archaeologically that avoids the trap of essentialism: the notion of ‘childness’. Childness is defined as the multiple conceptions of being, and being labeled, a child. The concept of being a child may be instantiated in different ways according to particular social, cultural, chronological, and religious contexts; childness is the measure of this variation. In Western historical settings, the most likely causes for such variation are the social processes of class and status via the closely associated ideologies of gentility and respectability and their attendant expectations around labor, as well as the shifts they represent in the social ideology of the family. Exploring childness, rather than children, provides an alternative way to approach the histories of contemporary Western understandings of childhood, including when particular types of childhood began and ended, and according to what criteria in different contexts, as well as how boundaries between child and adult were continually being established and re-negotiated.

Highlights

  • It is almost axiomatic that the archaeology of childhood should be far more than just documenting the presence or absence of children

  • This paper focuses on two historical archaeological studies undertaken on predominantly Christian cemeteries in different parts of rural South Australia: an analysis of emotion and ideology in the general and Catholic cemeteries of Mintaro, north of the capital city, Adelaide (Farrell 2003), and an investigation of the commemoration of children in a variety of denominational cemeteries across the Fleurieu Peninsula, south of Adelaide (Figure 1) (Degner 2007)

  • We have argued here that, while ‘a child’ might be constituted as a concept sharing certain sets of socially agreed-upon attributes at specific times, the concept itself will vary, such that particular types of child will be constructed within that matrix according to other social parameters, similar to gender, class, religion, or status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is almost axiomatic that the archaeology of childhood should be far more than just documenting the presence or absence of children. This paper focuses on two historical archaeological studies undertaken on predominantly Christian cemeteries in different parts of rural South Australia: an analysis of emotion and ideology in the general and Catholic cemeteries of Mintaro, north of the capital city, Adelaide (Farrell 2003), and an investigation of the commemoration of children in a variety of denominational cemeteries across the Fleurieu Peninsula, south of Adelaide (Figure 1) (Degner 2007) In both studies, the cemetery, as a product and reflection of familial, regional, and broader religious and socio-cultural ideologies, is used as a lens to view attitudes and beliefs about childhood through choices in grave design, placement, decoration, and arrangement.

The Invisible Child
Cemetery Studies and the Archaeology of Childhood
Toward an Archaeology of Childness
The Potential of Childness in Cemetery Studies
Demarcations of children’s cemetery spaces:
Conclusions
Findings
Background
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call